Article 1/3
Quantum Computing and GIS – Foundations and Challenges
Quantum computing is often presented as a major technological breakthrough, yet its concrete implications remain unclear for many application domains. In geomatics, where geographic information systems (GIS) must handle increasingly complex data and ever more demanding models, the question deserves to be addressed without hype.
This first article lays the groundwork. It revisits the core principles of quantum computing and examines why GIS now face structural computational limits. The goal is not to announce an imminent revolution, but rather to understand how quantum computing may provide a relevant conceptual framework for dealing with the growing complexity of spatial analysis.
Quantum computing and GIS: hype or a genuine path for spatial analysis?
Quantum computing regularly makes headlines in technology news, often accompanied by spectacular promises. But what does this new computing paradigm really mean for a field as concrete and operational as geographic information systems?
Between exploding data volumes, increasing network complexity, and the multiplication of decision-support criteria, GIS are facing very real limits of classical computing. Should we therefore turn to quantum computing, or does it remain a largely theoretical horizon?
In this article, we offer a clear-eyed and critical reading of the possible links between quantum computing and geomatics. Without unnecessary jargon or unrealistic promises, it explores the essential principles of quantum computing, the types of GIS problems that could potentially benefit from it, existing experiments, as well as current limitations and key points of caution.
This is an article for monitoring and reflection, aimed at geomatics professionals, teachers, researchers, and territorial decision-makers who want to understand what quantum computing might — or might not — bring to GIS in the years ahead.
Introduction: what is quantum computing?
For several decades, classical computing has been based on a simple principle: all information is encoded in the form of bits, taking the value 0 or 1. This binary logic has enabled spectacular advances, from geographic information systems and satellites to artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.
Today, however, certain physical and algorithmic limits are beginning to emerge, particularly for combinatorial or massively complex problems.
It is in this context that quantum computing is emerging — a new computing paradigm based not on the laws of classical electronics, but on those of quantum mechanics.
From bits to qubits
Unlike the classical bit, the basic unit of quantum computing is the qubit.
A qubit can represent a 0, a 1… or a superposition of both states at the same time. Added to this is a key phenomenon known as entanglement, whereby multiple qubits can become strongly correlated, regardless of the distance between them.
These properties theoretically allow the simultaneous exploration of a very large number of possible solutions, whereas a classical computer must test them one by one.
A new way to solve certain problems
It is important to emphasize that quantum computing will not replace classical computing.
Rather, it is designed to excel at very specific types of problems, such as:
- combinatorial optimization,
- searching very large solution spaces,
- certain complex simulations,
- or the analysis of large-scale graphs.
Actors such as IBM Quantum, Google Quantum AI, and D-Wave Systems are already developing experimental quantum processors accessible via the cloud, even though these machines remain limited and highly sensitive to noise.
Why should GIS care about quantum computing?
GIS manipulate ever-growing volumes of spatial data: complex networks, satellite imagery, multi-criteria models, accessibility calculations, and territorial or environmental simulations. Many of these problems involve intensive computation, optimization, or the search for “near-optimal” solutions within immense solution spaces.
Quantum computing therefore opens intriguing perspectives — not to replace existing GIS, but to accelerate or enrich certain very costly spatial processes that are currently difficult to solve at scale.
In the remainder of this article, we explore how these still largely experimental principles could, in the medium or long term, find concrete applications in the field of geographic information systems.
Introduction
GIS facing growing complexity
Geographic information systems have evolved profoundly over the past decades. Long focused on cartography and descriptive spatial analysis, they are now at the core of far more complex issues: territorial planning, mobility management, climate change adaptation, environmental monitoring, and multi-actor decision support.
This evolution is accompanied by an explosion in the complexity of both data and processing. GIS must now manage massive volumes of heterogeneous data (high-resolution satellite imagery, real-time sensors, socio-economic data), fine-grained spatial structures (networks, graphs, continuous surfaces), and models integrating numerous constraints. Added to this is a growing demand for rapid response times, particularly in operational or decision-making contexts.
The limits of classical computing in geomatics
In the face of these challenges, classical computing shows certain limits.
Many common GIS problems are combinatorial in nature: finding optimal paths in large networks, locating facilities under multiple constraints, spatial resource allocation, or territorial scenario simulation. As the number of variables and constraints increases, computation time grows rapidly, sometimes exponentially.
To cope with these difficulties, GIS often rely on heuristics or approximate approaches. These make it possible to obtain acceptable results within reasonable timeframes, but at the cost of trade-offs: non-optimal solutions, strong dependence on parameter choices, and difficulty in exploring the entire solution space. Despite advances in parallel computing, GPUs, and cloud infrastructures, certain classes of problems remain structurally expensive.
Quantum computing: between promise and caution
It is in this context that quantum computing is attracting growing interest. By exploiting principles from quantum mechanics, it offers a radically different approach to computation, particularly suited to certain optimization, search, and simulation problems. In theory, these machines could explore a vast number of possible solutions simultaneously, whereas classical computers must proceed sequentially or semi-parallel.
However, it would be illusory to view quantum computing as a miracle solution to the challenges facing GIS. Current technologies remain experimental, costly, and limited by noise and processor size. Moreover, not all geographic problems naturally lend themselves to quantum formulations.
The challenge is therefore not to replace existing GIS, but to consider quantum computing as a complementary tool, potentially capable of accelerating or enriching very specific processes. Exploring these perspectives requires curiosity, scientific rigor, and critical thinking — an essential stance to avoid hype and identify genuine contributions to geomatics.
Essential reminders about quantum computing
From bit to qubit: a paradigm shift
Classical computing relies on the bit, which can take only two exclusive states: 0 or 1. Every computing operation — including the most sophisticated GIS processing — ultimately boils down to sequences of logical operations on these bits.
Quantum computing introduces a fundamentally different unit of information: the qubit. Unlike the classical bit, a qubit can exist in a superposition of states, meaning it can simultaneously represent 0 and 1 with certain probabilities. This property makes it possible to manipulate, in a single operation, a large number of possible configurations.
Added to this is the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, through which multiple qubits become correlated. A change in the state of one instantaneously affects the others, regardless of distance. In a computational context, entanglement makes it possible to represent and constrain sets of variables collectively — a key feature for optimization problems.
Measurement, probabilities, and results
A frequent source of confusion concerns measurement.
As long as a qubit is not measured, it remains in a superposition state. When measured, this state “collapses” to a classical value (0 or 1). The result of a quantum computation is therefore probabilistic: the same program must be run multiple times to identify the most likely outcomes.
While this logic may seem unsettling to GIS practitioners accustomed to deterministic results, it resonates with approaches already used in geomatics, such as probabilistic models, scenario simulations, or sensitivity analyses.
Two major approaches to quantum computing
There are currently two main families of quantum machines, with very different implications for GIS.
Universal quantum computing
Universal quantum computing aims to reproduce, in quantum form, the logic of classical computers using quantum gates and circuits. This approach is being developed notably by IBM Quantum and Google Quantum AI.
It is particularly promising for:
- certain optimization algorithms,
- the simulation of complex systems,
- quantum machine learning.
However, these machines are still limited in the number of usable qubits and are highly sensitive to noise, restricting their use to experiments or small-scale problems.
Quantum annealing
Quantum annealing adopts a more pragmatic approach. It is specifically designed to solve optimization problems by searching for energy minima in a solution space. This method is primarily developed by D-Wave Systems.
From a GIS perspective, this approach is especially interesting because many spatial problems can be formulated as constrained optimization problems:
- spatial allocation,
- site selection,
- network optimization.
Quantum annealing does not always guarantee a global optimal solution, but it can rapidly provide very good approximate solutions — which already corresponds to many operational uses in geomatics.
Access to quantum technologies today
It is important to note that quantum computing is no longer confined to a handful of closed laboratories. Several platforms now offer remote cloud access, allowing users to test quantum algorithms on real or simulated machines.
For the GIS community, this means it is already possible to explore these technologies:
- for technological monitoring,
- for research projects,
- or for experiments on simplified datasets.
Nevertheless, the main effort does not lie in accessing the hardware, but in translating geographic problems into formulations compatible with quantum computing — a conceptual challenge addressed in the following sections.
3. GIS as a natural domain for complex computation
The inherently complex nature of geographic data
Geographic data are not simple tables of values. They combine geometry, topology, attributes, and spatial relationships, often across multiple scales. A geographic object only makes sense through its position, its neighbors, and its integration into a network or territory.
Added to this structural complexity is the diversity of data sources: satellite imagery, sensor data, administrative databases, collaborative contributions, and simulations. GIS must integrate these heterogeneous, sometimes incomplete or uncertain datasets while maintaining spatial coherence.
This multidimensional character naturally brings GIS close to problems where the solution space becomes extremely large and difficult to explore exhaustively.
Graphs, networks, and spatial relationships
Many GIS objects can be modeled as graphs: road networks, public transport systems, water or energy networks, ecological connectivity structures. In these graphs, each node and edge carries attributes, constraints, and sometimes dynamic behaviors.
Associated processes — routing, flow analysis, centrality, accessibility — quickly become computationally expensive when:
- the network is dense or very large,
- optimization criteria are multiple,
- constraints vary over time or across scenarios.
These issues correspond precisely to classes of problems for which quantum approaches are actively being explored.
Spatial optimization and combinatorial explosion
Spatial optimization is ubiquitous in GIS: where should facilities be located? How should resources be allocated? Which routes minimize environmental impact while respecting regulatory and economic constraints?
Each new constraint or variable adds an extra dimension to the problem. Very quickly, the number of possible configurations becomes astronomical — a phenomenon known as combinatorial explosion. Even with powerful computers, it becomes impossible to test all solutions.
GIS therefore rely on heuristic methods, genetic algorithms, or multi-criteria approaches to navigate this solution space. Quantum computing fits into this same logic of efficient exploration, but with fundamentally different mechanisms.
Parallels between geographic space and solution space
A particularly interesting point for geomatics professionals is the conceptual parallel between:
- geographic space, which is structured, constrained, and relational,
- and the solution space of a spatial optimization problem.
In both cases, the task is to navigate a complex space, identify relevant configurations, and exclude those that do not satisfy certain rules. Quantum computing does not “understand” geography, but it provides mathematical tools capable of representing and exploring these high-dimensional abstract spaces efficiently.
A natural affinity with probabilistic approaches
Finally, many GIS processes already incorporate uncertainty: incomplete data, measurement errors, future scenarios, non-deterministic behaviors. Probabilistic models, sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations are common in geomatics.
By its probabilistic nature, quantum computing therefore fits into a conceptual continuity rather than a total rupture. It offers another way of reasoning about uncertainty, variability, and the search for satisfactory — rather than perfectly optimal — solutions.
The previous sections have laid the groundwork: essential principles of quantum computing, the inherently complex nature of geographic data, and the reasons why GIS face structural computational limits. At this stage, quantum computing appears as a conceptually interesting, but still largely abstract, avenue.
The second part of this series moves from theory to potential applications. It does not aim to announce immediate operational uses, but to examine, domain by domain, the types of GIS problems for which quantum approaches could eventually provide insight or specific advantages.
This article inaugurates a series dedicated to the links between quantum computing and geographic information systems, with the aim of better understanding the real challenges posed by these emerging technologies for spatial analysis.
